But on to Dowd. (Of course, I didn't get a picture - I still don't think about these things until I get home. Besides, it's much more interesting to talk with someone, than to take their picture.)
Dowd is a proponent of "evolutionary theology". While I don't agree entirely with this philosophy, I do agree that his efforts are valuable. He reaches out to religious people - people hungry to know more, people feeling discord with science and religion and wanting integrity, and even people hungry to fight him on anything evolutionary, no matter what his message.
I like his word 'integrity'. There's a moral value associated with the word which speaks of wholeness and peace, but I also like that it suggests integration. Many militant athiests don't want to even allow for this path. But I think at this time in our very young understanding of the universe, evolution and psychology, we must allow for it. It's a valuable path at this time, and I'm glad he and Connie Barlow, his wife, are on it, and bringing others along with them.
Read his stuff here.
1 comment:
This is the guy with the van painted with his message, traveling the country with his wife? I saw an article about him a few months ago. What a treat to hear him speak.
And I understand what you mean about the tea. In Kansas, we live on the borderline between sweetened and unsweetened, but the restaurant consensus seems to be for sweetened. How refreshing when I go north not to get a long "tea"spoon in my glass. Our house is strictly unsweetened, although I think my husband, if he drank tea, might want sugar. He's from Missouri, so that explains it.
Post a Comment